#Axis and allies full version free free

And in 'Sinkiang?' You're talking about Tibet and the Taklamaken desert for crying out loud. It's hard enough to build factories on the coast without shipping materials inland. In the real war, the 'industrialization' of China was about the only thing the Allies failed at. No factories in landlocked territories (basically China, Sinkiang, and some Russian territories). (And my preferred strategy is to play a defensive Russia and not attack, because the Axis can now counterattack advantageously in either case, assuming average die rolls). I don't mind letting the Russians attack (even in Manchuria) just don't want Axis fighters killed off in the process. Move back fighters: If Russia is allowed to attack on the first move, Germany is allowed to move back one fighter and one armor from the Ukraine to Eastern Europe, and one fighter back from Finland to Eastern Europe, and Japan one fighter back from Manchuria to Kwantung BEFORE the game starts. Here are some fixes that I propose for the game: infantry attack feasible since the odds that the infantry will score a lucky hit have been cut in half.Д«eyond the traditional sitting around a table method you can try out this variation on the computer if you are lucky enough to have a copy of the out-of-print Iron Blitz (you can edit the infantry attack/defense values) it's also trivially easy to implement if you play-by-email. This change also makes a fighter-only vs. All of these factors bias the game just enough in favor of the attacker to prevent large stacks of infantry from materializing. 1/1 infantry means a one-on-one combat between two lone infantry becomes a fair fight, it means any additional attacking force is statistically overwhelming, and it means infantry alone defend so poorly as to be almost useless. What was once a defensive stalemate becomes a furor of attack and counter attack. This change takes some getting use to, but after only a game or two becomes second nature and dramatically changes the game for the better. Their effective defense means they are most valuable in large stacks that can devastate an attacking force with insufficient 'cannon fodder'.Дon suggests a brilliant and simple solution to the stalemated and long-developing game common between experienced players utilizing IPM: modify infantry so that they attack and defend on a roll of 1+. open to counterattack by a superior force).

Cheap means they are the only units you can ever afford to leave in a dead zone (i.e. infantry are the cheapest unit in the game and are twice as effective on defense as they are on offense). IPM works because the opportunity cost of all units is higher than infantry's (i.e. The US, UK and Japan also play IPM, but after a short delay to build navies and/or factories to move/spawn all this infantry. The essence of the IPM is that Germany and Russia should buy only infantry until the late game, after they have fortified their borders with infantry and established dead zones in Eastern Europe. This variation makes for an interesting opening game, strengthening the UK Sea Zone fleet, making it harder for the Allies to take out the German Mediterranean fleet, and giving Japan a little more of an edge in the Pacific.ДЄre there any other variations you've played with that you'd recommend?ДЇor advanced players, the overarching strategy of A&A reduces to the infantry push mechanic as described in Don Rae's excellent essays-this is especially true for 2nd edition games, which have 3/2 tanks vice 3/3 tanks.

A somewhat silly variation, but invariably adds some twists to the game. Every country must spend exactly 5 IPC per turn to do weapons development.Traditionally, Germany gets Jet Power and Japan gets Super Subs, but I've played where Germany and Japan can choose a technology of choice other than Heavy Bombers.

#Axis and allies full version free free

Free weapons developments for Axis powers.

This variation makes life very tough on Japan, especially if she has some poor luck in the Pacific to start the game off. The lowest bidders are awarded the Axis power(s) and are given their compensation, either before the game begins or at the start of their first turn. Namely, the unit of currency is decided - IPCs or infantry or tech rolls - and then each player writes down how much of the currency they'd need to play Germany or Japan after which all players reveal their bids.

Bidding system for choosing Axis player(s).

Personally, I don't consider this a rule variation because I only play games where this is enforced. Here are the variants I've played with - always looking for new suggestions! What rule variations do you recommend for playing Axis & Allies, from ones meant to balance the game to ones that add a little spice?